9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair towards the offender along with the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Because the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been attained, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of your Constitution. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically considered within the administrative discretion from the employer. However, there may be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
As the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be reached, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
PLR is actually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Because of this, only citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Consider it as calling somebody to inform them you’ve found their missing phone, then telling them you live in these kinds of-and-these kinds of neighborhood, without actually giving them an address. Driving round the neighborhood looking to find their phone is likely to generally be more frustrating than it’s worthy of.
The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her six-month report for the court, the worker elaborated within the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mildew the relief to make it appropriate to your facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified with the decision with the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This page contains click here slip opinions. Slip opinions are definitely the opinions that are filed to the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and are sometimes not the court's final opinion.
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should manage to deduce the logic from the decision and also the statutes.[four]
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners might find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more